samUhati
? samūhati , raises : āśvāsapraśvāsā uparudhvā ( mss. [Page575-a] °ruddhā) ūrdhvaṃ śīṛṣakapālaṃ vātā praharetsu samūhetsuḥ ( v.l. samuttejetsuḥ) Mv ii.125.6 ; I believe this would have to be an anomalous denom. to samūhata , q.v. , in the different meaning of raised , which is found also with ūhata , q.v. ; or at least, this form, if correct, must have been influenced by that word. But it may be that we should read samūhanetsuḥ, to *samūhanati, on the basis of the Pali parallel MN i.243.23 vātā muddhānaṃ ūhananti ( raise ); the LV version is confused and doubtful, vāyur ūrdh(v)aṃ śiraḥkapālam ( mss. °lām) upanihanti ( v.l. upasaṃharati) 252.1 , and āśvāsapraśvāsā ūrdh(v)aṃ śiraḥkapālam ( v.l. °lā) upanighnanti ( v.l. samuvaghnanti) 3—4; Senart implausibly connects the word with the noun samūha, detaching it from its evident direct object śīrṣakapālaṃ.