samADyAyikatA
samādhyāyika-tā , said to mean acquisition or possession of samādhi (so Foucaux ; Burnouf, Lotus , 798 ; and app. Tib. tiṅ ṅe ḥdzin sgrub par ): LV 34.6 (prose) prītisaṃbodhyaṅgaṃ dharmālokamukhaṃ °katāyai saṃvartate. So both edd. , no v.l. But I do not understand the formation; if a cpd. , the second member *āyika(-tā) does not seem plausible ( leading to , as if from ā plus root i?); nor can I make a plausible analysis by assuming suffixation, starting with samādhi; perhaps primary formation from Skt. samādhyāyati, instead of °dhyāyaka-, state of one that completely concentrates?