[ kruhi , Mv i.280.14 and ii.405.15 , so Senart with mss. ; but read brūmi in both. Note that mss. at ii.405.15 point to (a)ham as subject. In a number of other places the Mv mss. read kruhi or krumi ( ii.50.2, 12 ; 51.2, 12 ; 52.2 ; 181.16 ; 193.10 ; 256.15 ; 294.13 ; 482.12 ; iii.17.18 ; 214.4 ), but Senart always em. brūhi or brūmi; also in i.307.1 mss. krutha, Senart em. brutha, intending brūtha. Sometimes a corresponding Pali passage proves the emendation right, e.g. Mv iii.214.4 = DN ii.242.16 brūhi; Mv ii.50.2 = Jāt. v.387.21 vadāmi ( Mv brūmi). In my opinion Senart should have made a clean sweep of these erroneous forms and adopted brūmi in i.280.14 and ii.405.15 .]