cedAcitta
? cedācitta , instr. cedācittena LV 431.12 (prose; so only one ms. ; v.l. , two mss. , °cintena; all other mss. and Calc. have a haplographic omission here), is uninterpretable to me; I must assume a corruption, perhaps a misprint. Not noted by Weller . Foucaux ʼs Tib. omits the passage. (The particle ced can, it seems, hardly be involved.)